Friday, February 27, 2009

Huh.

I'm surprised I've never thought of this:
For every law they pass that bans something, we should get a law that lets us do something previously forbidden.
But it's definitely something I could get behind. It would certainly help keep the Nanny State at bay.

Of course, i would not support the reverse—i.e. that whenever a law is repealed, we have to pass a law that restricts something else. Yikes.

Anyway, interesting treatment of the subject. Read the whole thing.

You've especially got to love his use of the Volstead Act towards the end. (Link provided for those who need to take a refresher in American history).

No comments: